“Good Country people” and “Where are you going, Where have you been?” Essay

There are numerous similitudes between the short stories â€Å"Good Country People† and â€Å"Where are you going, Where have you been?†, most outstandingly their characters. The two stories contain a female hero, and a male foe, whose encounters begin moderately ordinary, and progress to an ever increasing number of dreamlike and turned endings. Their principle characters, Hulga and Connie, are amazingly comparable, but then oddly unique, one a multi year old wishing to be more established and delightful, the other a harsh multi year old, wishing to be more youthful and terrible. These accounts tell the stories of susceptible young ladies who are enticed by the enjoyments of unusual men, just to demonstrate to themselves at long last how guileless they truly are. In â€Å"Where are you going, Where have you been?†, Connie begins as most young ladies apparently would †she needs to be all the more brave, to seem more seasoned, to encounter a greater amount of the world. She slips from silly interests, to the adolescent or grown-up world, to drink and kiss young men as opposed to search for school garments, to see motion pictures in a hot vehicle rather than in a theater. She talks of being wonderful as though it were her lone acceptable effortlessness †excellence, to her, is a definitive objective. She needs to be more seasoned, and increasingly wonderful, and this is her defeat. Her stupidity, and her naivety is the thing that interests to Arnold Friend in any case. Arnold Friend, a more interesting, bids to her at an early stage in the story. He is more established, all the more impressive, and more brilliant. She is terrified, obviously, yet captivated, and it is her longing for the grown-up world, and the grown-up life, that, at long last, causes her ruin. She is suckered in by the persuading conman who utilizes his words to speak to her shortcomings. She is fooled into being what Arnold needs her to be by his smooth words and his faã §ade of certainty. She’s played with, played for the naã ¯ve fool she is, who is unreasonably youthful for the world she needs to be a piece of. Just at the finish of the story does she start to acknowledge what she has gotten herself into. She gives her real nature once she is defied. In â€Å"Good Country People†, Joy is a generally ordinary young lady with some not very typical issues. For a certain something, her leg got brushed off when she was more youthful in a strange chasing mishap. This physical change made her totally reluctant, and basically destroyed her life. She could noâ longer be glad acting naturally, on the grounds that she considers herself to be genuine offensiveness now. Therefore, she feels compelled to make herself what she thinks she is. She loathes magnificence now, and fundamentally alters her to appear to be monstrous. She’s been to school, yet still acts adolescent. She’s attempting to be youthful, and terrible. What's more, Manley Pointer sees this nature of her, and exploits her. Regardless of how revolting she attempts to be, he despite everything attempts to (or possibly claims to) like her for what her identity is. Hulga is, paying little heed to her appalling effort, very complimented, and lets her gatekeeper down long enough for Manley to pull off her glasses, her leg, and all the more significantly, her pride. She is likewise stabbed in the back dependent on her own uncertainties. She also is a casualty of a conman who sees that things aren’t consistently what they appear. Connie and Hulga are fundamentally the same as, as characters, but totally different no different. The two of them have their instabilities, and they are both effortlessly gone after by conmen and smooth talkers, yet their weaknesses are in altogether various domains. The two of them need what different has, and because of this, they are continually attempting to be another person, not themselves, and this is the thing that makes them so natural to assault. They don’t know who they truly are, and they think they need to be something different. This naivety is their defeat †they claim to be something different, join a gathering they shouldn’t be in, and they are enticed by the men in these gatherings. Be that as it may, when the tables turn, and their men aren’t what they give off an impression of being, Connie and Hulga return totally, from moderately certain fakes to whimpering young ladies, defenseless and miserable, in their phony lives. These two ladies are apparently guiltless, arbitrary observers picked by more seasoned more brilliant conmen. Notwithstanding, one could without much of a stretch consider them liable for their own destinies. Not that the casualty in a wrongdoing is to be faulted, in any case, truly, in the event that you leave your vehicle entryway open, with the keys inside, and the engine running, while you go inside a store for a couple of hours, by what method can you appear to be stunned when it gets taken? These two ladies, regardless of whether they in all honesty, are waving several banners at these conmen †â€Å"Please target me!†Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ â€Å"Take my leg!†Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ By transparently parading their weaknesses and by permitting themselves to be enchanted to the point of trusting the conmen, they are, in the event that not entirely, at that point at any rate in part liable for their own destinies. They came to theirâ own resolutions, and they got what they merited. Connie and Hulga are a similar individual, basically †a lady with various issues wishes to be something that they are not, and more shrewd and smoother conmen see this, and exploit them. At long last, they are demonstrated to be the fakes that they truly are, and are left increasingly defenseless, and progressively open, than they were before they attempted to penetrate the world in which they didn’t have a place. On the off chance that there were a mutual good to these accounts, and there is without a doubt not a conspicuous one, they’d both be some place along the lines of â€Å"Be content with what you have, in light of the fact that you probably won't have a place anyplace else†, and in the instances of Connie and Hulga, this ethical fits consummately. They are a similar individual with various conditions, and they are so effortlessly went after by the savvier smoother conman. As these accounts explicitly state, be content with what you have. You probabl y won't fit anyplace else, and one day, somebody may very well challenge you on your blustering, to shocking results.